See our Photo of the Week (and archive of more) ... and the echo follows

Opinion Advertize Permission
To be notified of new articles Survey Store About Us

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments
on Mandatory Checkoff Program

Midwestern hog farmers attend hearing in Washington, D.C.

Bryce Oates
Washington, D.C.

Hogs on the Storm family farm near Bosworth, Missouri.
Hogs on the Storm family farm near Bosworth, Missouri. Photo by Nic Paget-Clarke.

December 8, 2004 -- The Supreme Court heard arguments challenging the constitutionality of the mandatory beef checkoff program today. The decision, expected in the spring of 2005, will likely determine the fate of the mandatory pork checkoff. Midwestern hog farmers with the Campaign for Family Farms (CFF), which is a named plaintiff in the mandatory pork checkoff case, attended today’s hearing

“Hog farmers are sick and tired of paying into a system that promotes factory farms and industrial agriculture over independent producers,” said Rhonda Perry, a Missouri hog farmer and member of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center. “Mandatory checkoffs have been fueling the demise of family farms.”

“We have fought long and hard to end the mandatory pork checkoff,” said independent Minnesota hog farmer Rich Smith, member of the Land Stewardship Project. “We won the referendum and two federal court decisions. We are confident the Supreme Court will uphold these decisions and terminate the mandatory checkoffs once and for all.”

In 1998, the CFF initiated what has become a national movement against mandatory commodity checkoffs with a petition drive calling for a hog farmer referendum to decide if the program should be ended. That led to a vote conducted by the USDA in August-September 2000 in which over 30,000 U.S. hog producers voted 53% to 47% to terminate the mandatory pork checkoff. Following the announcement of the vote results in January 2001, the then U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman ordered the termination of the program. Hog farmers have paid more than $170 million into the pork checkoff since Secretary Glickman announced the results of the referendum, and will continue to be forced to pay into the checkoff until the Supreme Court makes its final decision in early 2005.

However, in a move which outraged hog farmers around the country and various members of Congress, the newly appointed Secretary of Agriculture Ann Veneman cut a backroom deal with the National Pork Producers Council in February 2001 which led to throwing out the results of a democratic vote and forcing hog farmers to continue paying into the checkoff program. This action led to CFF's lawsuit against the USDA, which specifically claimed that the mandatory pork checkoff violates hog producers' constitutional rights by infringing on the First Amendment.

In ruling the pork checkoff unconstitutional in October 2003, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the pork checkoff “compels [hog farmers] to express a message with which they do not agree,” and struck down the entire Pork Act. Federal District Court Judge Richard Enslen ruled in October 2002 that the pork checkoff forces hog farmers to pay into a program that they believe is contrary to their interests because it supports factory-style hog production and corporate control of the industry. The checkoff, therefore, is “unconstitutional and rotten,” Judge Enslen ruled.

“We’ve come here to fight the commodity groups which are nothing but the mouthpieces for corporate agriculture,” said Iowa farmer Larry Ginter, a member of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement. “We will defeat the mandatory checkoffs, and in doing so, we’ll begin to reclaim American agriculture for family farmers and the American public.”

  • The CFF amicus brief can be viewed here.
  • Other documents related to the pork checkoff case can be viewed here.

The Campaign for Family Farms is a coalition of farm and rural groups leading the fight against the corporate takeover of the hog industry and working for policies supporting independent family farmers. CFF members groups include: Missouri Rural Crisis Center, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, The Land Stewardship Project (MN), Citizen's Action Coalition of Indiana, and the Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Farmers' Legal Action Group (FLAG) represents CFF and the individual hog farmers in the checkoff lawsuit.

NOTE: Hog farmers available for interviews

Four farmers who are named parties in the pork checkoff case will be available for in-person or phone interviews. They can be reached at the phone numbers listed below, denoted as “(in DC).” If you have trouble reaching them, contact Bryce Oates at the Missouri Rural Crisis Center at 573-449-1336.

  • Rhonda Perry, Missouri Rural Crisis Center (in DC), (573) 808-6013
  • Larry Ginter, Iowa CCI (in DC), (515) 238-5991
  • Rich Smith, Jim Joens, Land Stewardship Project (in DC), (507) 360-2211
  • Susan Stokes, Attorney, Farmers Legal Action Group, (612) 387-5577

Published in In Motion Magazine, December 8, 2004

Email, Opinions & Discussion

If you have any thoughts on this or would like to contribute to an ongoing discussion in the
E-mail, Opinions & Discussion column click here to send e-mail to

In Unity/NPC Productions/Links

What is New? || Affirmative Action || Art Changes || Autonomy: Chiapas - California ||
Community Images || Education Rights || E-mail, Opinions and Discussion ||
En español || Essays from Ireland || Global Eyes || Healthcare ||
Human Rights/Civil Rights || Piri Thomas ||
Photo of the Week || QA: Interviews || Region || Rural America ||

Search || Donate || To be notified of new articles || Survey ||
In Motion Magazine's Store || In Motion Magazine Staff ||
In Unity Book of Photos ||
Links Around The World || OneWorld / US ||
NPC Productions

Copyright © 1995-2011 NPC Productions as a compilation. All Rights Reserved.